CORRUPTION: Things Falling Apart

Corruption Burns Your Soul

What’s up?

Through an assessment from a number of contemporary perspectives, a generalized conception of the phenomenon of corruption portrays it as a sort of evil and ethically derogatory influence on the human being and his/her environs that leads to destruction or regression. This entails that the majority of human societal actions causing degeneration on cherished societal morals and peace, may have their root causes from corrupt acts.

Also, from an inherent consensus that convicts all human beings as born culprits of the crime or offense of corruption, it becomes plausible that we all, are bound to live with  the corrupt nature while, only fairly striving to accept and adhere to the anti-corrupt models within the society. 

1. Can we really identify any major societal ill or conflict that does not have any linking causal roots to the phenomenon of corruption?  
2. Is it possible for us to deny our true selves in order to adapt to morally modest societal standards?
3. Within both moral and physical perceptions, in what ways can we identify with the conceptive impacts of corruption?
4. What will be left of the society when such a barbaric conception of corruption is made manifested within such a society?

What’s Down?

Despite the fact that corruption is being maximally criticized from several perspectives and considered the as a societal ‘evil’ which impedes development and destroys the ethical values of proper moral conduct, some writers still argued that, it also has a positive development scope which have been necessary for the economic growth of certain countries and the facilitation of complex bureaucratic proceedings. In focus, Daniel Kaufman’s central theme of the ‘grease-the-wheels’ argument claims that bribery may allow firms to get things done in an economy plagued by bureaucratic holdups and be a way to get around tax and regulatory burdens.

• If corruption, therefore, at one instant become a positive aspect to facilitate economic processes, then, why is it widely classified and generally addressed with a bitter amoral sensitivity reproach?

Your comments are highly solicited.

Currently, MAHSRA is undergoing a series of research works on community conflicts’ intervention schemes and best ways for integrating pragmatic peace policy development and direct peace activity growth within local, national, intergovernmental, and international frameworks. Your support and or Partnership will be highly appreciated. 

Support MAHSRA’s Community Peace Projects and Still Gained a Special and Detailed Copy via:  MAIL

Subject of mail should be: Corruption: Things Falling Apart

You may obtain a copy through: Amazon 

Preview Author’s Profile at: Kelly NGYAH

Note:   By obtaining a copy of this document through the support link or email, you are directly partnering as one of the supporters/donors of MAHSRA’s Peace Initiatives. As such, you may confirm in writing to us to let us know if your name should be included and/or published within the organization’s funders’ bulletin. This list may become periodically published on the website as soon as necessary.

Enter Discussion Forums of this work at: MAHSRA FORUMS

Please You can also show support by using the sharing tools below to extend on facebook, google and more. 

Thank You for Your Support 

DEMOCRACY AND CONFLICTS

Does Liberty and Freedoms Cause Conflicts?

What’s up?

The concept of democracy as a conflict catalyst has mostly been criticized by scholars and other followers of the democratic discuss.  Assuming that, the modern democratic development process considers individual welfare in concurrent competition with the universal declaration of the human rights, the major difficulty will thus rest in the authority of the entire community in regards to its minorities. The question here goes thus:

• If the majority rule holds, then, what happens to the minorities? 

• Are we certain that, such minorities will stay silent in the midst of their disregard?

Fair enough issues of modern democratic development, just as in almost every other domain, are being tempered with justice in order to see into the needs of the minorities. Yet there is still a controversy here that needs to be seriously addressed:

• Is there any rule of law that has a clean jurisdiction and autonomy without the arbitrary intervention of justice?

What’s Down?

Individualistic tendencies have always been the root causes of separatist goals and desires within the society, especially within groups’ or State politics. Now, the modern development and growth of individual liberties under the spectrum of liberal constitutionalism, grants individuals autonomous rights and freedoms to act under the law and which, they become only limited within the abstract conception of such abstract rules, as accepted by all.

1. With the individualistic or egoistic and belligerent nature of human individual majorities, what becomes of such individual autonomous rights within the society?
2. Knowing that the majority of individuals will not hesitate to wage a war against one another for egoistic benefits, what becomes of the society that ‘licitly’ provides liberties and freedoms that could promote such individualistic or egoistic tendencies?
3. At the tail, are democratic freedoms and individual liberty ideals best suited to contain and maintain the divergence of human egoism and aspirations vis-à-vis human actions in the context of a free and peaceful world?

Your comments are highly solicited.

Currently, MAHSRA is undergoing a series of research works on community conflicts’ intervention schemes and best ways for integrating pragmatic peace policy development and direct peace activity growth within local, national, intergovernmental, and international frameworks. Your support and or Partnership will be highly appreciated. 

Support MAHSRA’s Community Peace Projects and Still Gained a Special and Detailed Copy via:  MAIL

Subject of mail should be: Democracy and Conflicts

You may obtain a copy through: Amazon 

Preview Author’s Profile at: Kelly NGYAH

Note:   By obtaining a copy of this document through the support link or email, you are directly partnering as one of the supporters/donors of MAHSRA’s Peace Initiatives. As such, you may confirm in writing to us to let us know if your name should be included and/or published within the organization’s funders’ bulletin. This list may become periodically published on the website as soon as necessary.

Enter Discussion Forums of this work at: MAHSRA FORUMS

Please You can also show support by using the sharing tools below to extend on facebook, google and more. 

Thank You for Your Support
 

TYRANNY AND PEACE: A Virtual Spectrum

Lost Hopes

What’s up?

 No matter how obvious the virtual spectrum of peace and stability within a country ruled by a tyrant may be, based on several exemplary cases, it usually becomes very disastrous for the long term stability of peaceful solidarity within such a country.

As such, it’s not uncommon anymore to see that within several autocratic regimes that have been toppled, their actual analytical situations have proven that, the situation of peace within those countries worsen as the days go by.

1. If we are seeking for peace and stability, but still have it that, when a tyrant or an autocrat is dethroned for the sake of democracy and individual liberties, all that is left is discrimination, chaos and continues struggles to succeed power, was there really a need to topple the virtually stable regime in the first place? 

What’s Down?

Reflecting on autocratic regimes that faced virtual peace and stability such as: Egypt, Lybia, Zaire, and Iraq, that have been toppled, it is clear to predict that, the citizens within those countries face worse conflicts and insecurity as compared to their former country regime status.

With the mentioned reflection, it becomes probable to induce that, if the actual purpose for toppling an autocratic regime is to sort a more peaceful society, then, this has been a failure because, the victimized country situation become very unstable. Also, the failure arises from the fact that, the new zeal political leadership in charge is still very inapt to consolidate modern pragmatic democracy aspirations of the country people in correlative respects with their formerly understood autocratic governance mechanisms. As such, permanent conflicts and battles over diversified and crisscrossing new deal political aspirations.

1. If the paramount objective for governance actions is to maintain peace and stability within the society, what can you say in respect to the situation of a government that seems to be in peace under a tyrant, but when toppled, severe political crises become predominant and increase insecurity?
2. Is it necessary to change or abruptly topple a seeming autocratic rule which provides security to its citizens and leave it in the hands of unprepared political amateurs or should such systems instead train their political elites towards the maintenance of peace and stability?

However, in every situation we may suppose that:

All is virtual and we can only know it’s real when it succeeds us, and even when it succeeds us, we still do not know because we are not there anymore, so, the best alternative will be to preserve it till it succeeds us, then as such, we suppose it’s real 

This is Sustainable Peace

Your comments are highly solicited.

Currently, MAHSRA is undergoing a series of research works on community conflicts’ intervention schemes and best ways for integrating pragmatic peace policy development and direct peace activity growth within local, national, intergovernmental, and international frameworks. Your support and or Partnership will be highly appreciated. 

Support MAHSRA’s Community Peace Projects and Still Gained a Special and Detailed Copy via:  MAIL

Subject of mail should be: Tyranny and Peace

You may obtain a copy through: Amazon 

Preview Author’s Profile at: Kelly NGYAH

Note:   By obtaining a copy of this document through the support link or email, you are directly partnering as one of the supporters/donors of MAHSRA’s Peace Initiatives. As such, you may confirm in writing to us to let us know if your name should be included and/or published within the organization’s funders’ bulletin. This list may become periodically published on the website as soon as necessary.

Enter Discussion Forums of this work at: MAHSRA FORUMS

Please You can also show support by using the sharing tools below to extend on facebook, google and more. 

Thank You 

ETHNIC CONFLICTS AND INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY BIASES

What’s up?

Amidst the numerous causal factors that may lead to violent ethnic conflicts, the majority discusses haven’t yet demonstrated the real problem solving opportunity medium in the regard.

Is it that researchers and followers of the school of thought on ethnicism and ethnic conflicts have not found the true path to success in the phenomenon, or, is it that modern or western philosophies have concerted to banalise views in the regard so as to escape from certain inculpating positions of guilt?

What’s Down?

The complexity that encloses the presentation of ethnic conflict issues is surely a major reason why progress in the domain is being systematically slowed down. If we can assess the phenomenon of greed and the desire for discriminatory economic and political power in the perspective, then, we may probably discover how third party political entrepreneurs do immensely contribute in fueling ethnic conflicts for private gain. No doubts, the strategy of these spoilers is to interfere and manipulate the social liberalist community individual into struggles over values which are truly, not as as valuable as they are made to represent, or, are equally shared within the community.

1. Accepting ethnic strives are always reported to start and grow within community notions of discrimination, marginalization and neglect, what could be the probable additional reasons behind such leadership perpetrating greed?
2. Given that the game of the political entrepreneurs as potential spoilers within ethnic conflict opportunities is only virtual and most often camouflaged, how can the victimized communities readjust to face the shadows of their misleading leaders?
3. In a prolonged ethnic strife, how can it be possible to see the roots of the problem or to effectively solve the problem if those ‘Who stand and plan to gain little or most …’ in the situation are unknown?
4. Through which means or ways can we determine those third party bodies or foreign government representatives who, in a bias manner, will connive to fuel or virtually settle ethnic tensions in order to achieve their aims?

Your comments are highly solicited.

Currently, MAHSRA is undergoing a series of research works on community conflicts’ intervention schemes and best ways for integrating pragmatic peace policy development and direct peace activity growth within local, national, intergovernmental, and international frameworks. Your support and or Partnership will be highly appreciated. 

Support MAHSRA’s Community Peace Projects and Still Gained a Special and Detailed Copy via:  MAIL

Subject of mail should be: Ethnic Conflicts and International Community Biases

You may obtain a copy through: Amazon or Lulu

Preview Author’s Profile at: Kelly NGYAH

Note:   By obtaining a copy of this document through the support link or email, you are directly partnering as one of the supporters/donors of MAHSRA’s Peace Initiatives. As such, you may confirm in writing to us to let us know if your name should be included and/or published within the organization’s funders’ bulletin. This list may become periodically published on the website as soon as necessary.

Enter Discussion Forums of this work at: MAHSRA FORUMS

Please You can also show support by using the sharing tools below to extend on facebook, google and more. 

Thank You